UPDATE: DETAILS: COURT FINDS BOBBY VELASQUEZ GUILTY OF RAPING 15 YEAR OLD NIECE

 

convicted rapist Bobby Velasquez with prime minister of sxm Sarah Wescot Williams

Bobby Velasquez, was found not guilty 4 months ago, however The Joint Court of Justice, has OVERTURNED his acquittal,

and therefore he is SUPPOSED to serve 15 months, for RAPING is fifteen year old niece, but the judge SUSPENDED 12 of those months.

Why?

Because Bobby Velasquez,

after having been charged with the rape of his minor niece,

was given HOUSE ARREST.

HIS IMPRISONMENT, was residing in luxury above The GreenHouse Restaurant, while his underlings brought him trays of gourmet food, and slandered the minor child, who had been accused of raping.

So as sick and disgusting as that is,

because YOU know if it was YOU or your brother,

accused of sexually assaulting a child…

YOU would be in jail right now,

but the rich are different.

The Joint Court found it legally and convincingly proven that the 66 year old Bobby Velasquez

HAD SEXUALLY ABUSED HIS MINOR NIECE.

But according to the local media,

Mr Bobby V. will not be going to jail to serve those three months anytime soon.

Bobby V. has filed an appeal with the Supreme Court against the verdict today.

It is a long procedure,

and the process is expected to last more than a year,

before there is any true closer.

Velasquez, evidently is filing the appeal on a technicality,

questions of “guilt” or “innocence” will not be relevant.

According to the Judge who tried the original case,

the young, female victim gave DETAILED ACCOUNT,

of what transpired in her uncle’s house,

on the night of the incident.

Her statements were CONSISTENT with statements by her parents, various friends, her school counselor, her psychiatrist, and by SMS messages she had “texted” to her boyfriend.

SEVERAL JUDGES, on the other hand,

pointed out that MR BOBBY VELASQUEZ WAS THE ONE WHO WAS INCONSISTENT ABOUT HIS TESTIMONY.

And about how and where he’d “rubbed” sunscreen on his nieces body.

The court and judges had a lot to say about the reliability of what Bobby had stated,

but they pointed out that at 66years old,

his age would be a factor when it comes to sentencing.

One question.

If HER age wasn’t a factor to Bobby Velasquez,

why should Velasquez’s age be a factor when it comes to the sentencing.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s