ELDRIDGE, HOW DARE YOU CALL IN TO ORAL’S PROGRAM WITH SO MUCH PROOF, OF YOUR DOUBLE AGENT WORK?

  • next move…‏

JUST A LITTLE HELLO. HOPE ALL IS OK. STEADY SHE GO. SPEAK TO MBM AS SOON AS ITS CONVENIENT. GREETINGS. JR AM OUT OF TROUBLE.
To Sarah Wescott-Williams
 
From: julian rollocks (julianrollocks@hotmail.com)
Sent: Thu 7/24/08 3:19 PM
To: Sarah Wescott-Williams (comed@sintmaarten.net)
 
 
 
JUST A LITTLE HELLO. HOPE ALL IS OK. STEADY SHE GO. SPEAK TO MBM AS SOON AS ITS CONVENIENT.
GREETINGS. JR
AM OUT OF TROUBLE.
 
 
From: comed@sintmaarten.net To: julianrollocks@hotmail.com Subject: RE: next move… Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:08:16 -0400 JR, While I was on the phone, explaining Ramona my position, your email came
To acbrown@caribserve.net
 
From: julian rollocks (julianrollocks@hotmail.com)
Sent: Mon 7/21/08 12:19 PM
To: acbrown@caribserve.net
 
 
 
 


From: comed@sintmaarten.net
To: julianrollocks@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: next move…
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:08:16 -0400

JR,
 
While  I was on the phone, explaining Ramona my position, your email came in. And my position basically is in line with what you are thinking. And there is still more to it. That is why I don’t make hasty decisions.
1.       Why would we sacrifice Roy in the process to give the NA a piece of government? To save face in the MBM saga, that’s all that we are doing. The skirmishes in the DP will continue, as every-one tries to push their luck. But I think, the bed they are in, is the one they know. And every so often, we need “a July 1”. You remember, “you think you can form a government, go”. Nobody got up.  Granted, Roy has a lot of political baggage, but we keep on Louie, whose future is also encumbered. Theo’s main issue is that in a national government, projects will not be criticized by an opposition. If the projects are that sound and above board, we have a majority. Why can’t we like always take a position of “let them talk and answer themselves”, we got the numbers?
2.       Listening carefully to the ranks and files of the DP, it is not a popular move. While I know our members good enough to know they will leave the final call up to me, why create an issue?
3.       If the NA had some particular good will with the Dutch, that could have helped moved the constitutional  process along. I know of no such good will, to the contrary. We are already on one line where that is concerned, so what’s the difference? We need to not give them (NA) an opportunity to detach themselves from it. But on the other hand, what will they say? We don’t agree with the way Sarah is going about it? They have committed themselves to the process already. And while they shout a lot about it, they don’t have the “testicular fortitude”  to opt for another option, such as independence.
4.       If joining would get us a state secretary in the fed. Govt, what would that in essence mean, except a position for some-one? What is the added value of Roland?
5.       This thing about the motion of non-confidence is b.s. Then why did they call for her resignation? Obviously, they did that not knowing better, but it is there. But I remain convinced that notwithstanding, they would not hesitate to bring her in. Why share power equally, when you can get total control by throwing MBM a commissioner post?
6.       We should be concentrating on renewing strategies for the DP. A fourth term in these times is unprecedented. Look at recent elections in the region. Performing governments have been unseated.  Look at the polls in St.Kitts for a man like Douglas, who has done everything right. Yet, from polls he will get a run for his money.
7.       “lest we end  up like Moses and the promised land”.
You don’t have to ask what I spend my week-end doing, chilling out at  Mullet Bay Beach with the family and grands. I don’t think I have been there since the hurricanes. How is Eldridge doing? Let him know I inquired about him.
Enjoy your days abroad. And remember “stay out of trouble”, at least until you’re back.
 
SWW
 
From: julian rollocks [mailto:julianrollocks@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 4:39 PM
To: comed@sintmaarten.net
Subject: next move…
 
HI COMISH,
 

ITS BEEN A WHILE:

A FEW THINGS.

 

COMMISH,

FROM ALL INDICATIONS THIS COALITION “THING” IS TICKLISH.

INITIALY I THOUGHT OK. BUT NOW PERSONALY “NO”, UNLESS BETTER CANT BE DONE. I THINK WE HAVE ONE MORE OPTION.

AS LEADER OF DP AND OUR GOVERMENT YOU SHOULD CALL A MEETING BETWEEN YOURSELF AND COMM. BUNCAMPER.

YOU SHOULD DISCUSS WHAT HER NEEDS AND WANTS ARE. SHE MUST BE CONFRONTED WITH THE DAMAGE DONE, AND THE POSSIBILITIES OF THE FUTURE WITH OTHERS TRYING TO CAPITALISE ON THE DVIISION IN THE PARTY ON THIS ISSUE.

 

OPTION 1: RESIGN THE TELECOM PORTFOLIO WHICH WILL COOL OFF SOME OF THE CRIRICISM.

COMMISH FOR YOUR INFO, NA WONT MAKE THE FINAL STEP, AS THEY ARE PLANNING TO TELL THE PUBLIC WE HAVE FILED A MOTION NOT AGAINST THE COMMISIONER OF TELECOM BUT AGAINST HOW SHE HANDLED THE PORTFOLIO.BUT OTHERWISE SHE IS VERY COMPETENT.

THIS SUPPOSE TO OPEN A DOOR FOR THEM TO WORK WITH M.B.

SO THEY ARE LEAVING 2 DOORS OPEN.THE DP DOOR AND THE M.B DOOR.

 

OPTION 2: SIT WITH M.B. COME TO AN UNDERSTANDING. CALL A JOINT PRESS CONFERENCE AND CLEAR UP THE SITUATION TO THE PUBLIC OF SXM.

 

OPTION 3: SIT WITH “GOLDEN” BOY AND EXPLAINE HIM WHY ITS BETTER WE MAINTAIN GOVT AS IS.HE IS FOR THE “BROADBASE”.

 

IN CLOSING,

COMMISH I AM GOING CURACAO TO PICK UP THE FAMILY TO GO TO MIAMI FOR A 10 DAY VACATION.

 

LETS STAY IN TOUCH, AND PLEASE STAY OUT OF TROUBLE TILL I SEE YOU. I WILL DO THE SAME.

 

 

GROETJES,

JR

 

Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger. Get started.



Stay in touch when you’re away with Windows Live Messenger. IM anytime you’re online.

 
 
SWS, THAT IS WHY I ENJOY WORKING WITH YOU. NOT BECAUSE OF WE NECESARILY ALLWAYS AGREEING ON EVERYTHING, BUT BECAUSE OF THE USE OF WISDOM. WE ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT GETTING OLDER FOR NOTHING. SWS, YOUR CARE
To Sarah Wescott-Williams
 
From: julian rollocks (julianrollocks@hotmail.com)
Sent: Sun 7/20/08 9:13 PM
To: Sarah Wescott-Williams (comed@sintmaarten.net)
 
 
 
 
SWS,
 
THAT IS WHY I ENJOY WORKING WITH YOU. NOT BECAUSE OF WE NECESARILY ALLWAYS AGREEING ON EVERYTHING, BUT BECAUSE OF THE USE OF WISDOM. WE ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT GETTING OLDER FOR NOTHING. SWS, YOUR CAREFUL APROACH IS NOT ALLWAYS POPULAR, BUT I ALLWAYS SAY “WE GIVE ADVISE, AND SHE WILL EVENTUALY TAKE THE CORRECT DECISION AS IT WILL NOT BE ” HOT AND SWEATY”.
AS I GROW OLDER I TRY FOR WISDOM AND TIME TO PREVAIL IN MY REASONING. MY POSITION TO MANY IN AND OUT DP: LEADING A GOVERMENT IS NO EASY TASK WITH ALL THE CONFLICTING INTERESTS.GIVE “THE WOMAN” HER SPACE. ON “RAMGOAT SUNDAY”, IF YOU REMEMBER WELL I SAID, WE SHOULD BE VERY CAREFUL WITH A GOVT THAT IS ONLY MOTIVATED BY MULTIMILLIONDOLLAR PROJECTS. YOU KNOW THE PLAYERS IN AND OUT…..
 
COMMISH, CONTINUE TO BE CAUTIOUS IN THE FACE OF THE FACT THAT IT MIGHT NOT BE THE POPULAR POSITION. I SUPPORT THAT.
THE NA WANTS  IN PERIOD. BUT ONCE THEY ARE IN, THEN WHAT???? ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE. AS  IT  IS, EXERCISING CONTROL IS A TASK . IMAGINE WORKING WITH MY COUSIN. AND WE BOTH HAVE DONE THAT.
 
THE DAY AFTER “RAMGOAT SUNDAY”, LAVEIST WAS CALLED IN SEVERE QUESTIONING(SOURCES ARE SOLID, RAMONA KNOWS).
A CONTINGENCY HAS TO BE CREATED JUST IN CASE.SO WHEN THE TIME FEELS RIGHT SIT WITH BUNCAMPER, AND TRY TO COME UP
A COMFORTABLE SOLUTION. BUT YOU AND HER MUST HAVE AN EYEBALL TO EYEBALL.
 
BESIDES, YES A NOTHER TERM WILL BE A CHALLENGING ORDER.ANY GOVT IN ANY PART OF THE WORLD WITH AMONG OTHER THINGS GASPRICES, AND PRICES OF FOOD AND BASIC COMMODITIES WILL HAVE  A TASK GETTING RE-ELECTED.
COMMISH, I AM NOT SCARED. I ASSISTED YOU IN DOING IT ONCE, AND I AM WILLING PREPARED AND ABLE TO ASSIST YOU AGAIN. ONLY THIS TIME WE WONT HAVE AS MUCH INTERNAL SCEPTICISM, WHICH WILL MAKE MY JOB AND FOCUS EASIER. SO ‘LET NOT YOUR HEART BE TROUBLED’, BETWEEN MONA, MYSELF AND A FEW OTHERS THEY(N.A) WILL NOT BE GETTING NO GIFT.
 
COMMISH, HOLD STEADY. AND STAY FOCUSED.
 
ELDRIGE IS OUT, AND I WILL GIVE YOUR REGARDS. I WILL BE OUT FOR ALITTLE, PLEASE DO KEEP ME INFORMED.
 
THANKS FOR THE UPDATE, AND I WILL KEEP OUT OF TROUBLE, EVEN IF IT IS JUST SO THAT NO ONE COULD TELL SWW NO NONSENSE.
 
UNTILL SOON……EVITA PROBLEMA TE MI BINI BEK.
JR
 
 
JR, While I was on the phone, explaining Ramona my position, your email came in. And my position basically is in line with what you are thinking. And there is still more to it. That is why I don’t mak
To julianrollocks@hotmail.com
 
From: Sarah Wescott-Williams (comed@sintmaarten.net)
Sent: Sun 7/20/08 6:03 PM
To: julianrollocks@hotmail.com
 
 
 
JR,
 
While  I was on the phone, explaining Ramona my position, your email came in. And my position basically is in line with what you are thinking. And there is still more to it. That is why I don’t make hasty decisions.
1.       Why would we sacrifice Roy in the process to give the NA a piece of government? To save face in the MBM saga, that’s all that we are doing. The skirmishes in the DP will continue, as every-one tries to push their luck. But I think, the bed they are in, is the one they know. And every so often, we need “a July 1”. You remember, “you think you can form a government, go”. Nobody got up.  Granted, Roy has a lot of political baggage, but we keep on Louie, whose future is also encumbered. Theo’s main issue is that in a national government, projects will not be criticized by an opposition. If the projects are that sound and above board, we have a majority. Why can’t we like always take a position of “let them talk and answer themselves”, we got the numbers?
2.       Listening carefully to the ranks and files of the DP, it is not a popular move. While I know our members good enough to know they will leave the final call up to me, why create an issue?
3.       If the NA had some particular good will with the Dutch, that could have helped moved the constitutional  process along. I know of no such good will, to the contrary. We are already on one line where that is concerned, so what’s the difference? We need to not give them (NA) an opportunity to detach themselves from it. But on the other hand, what will they say? We don’t agree with the way Sarah is going about it? They have committed themselves to the process already. And while they shout a lot about it, they don’t have the “testicular fortitude”  to opt for another option, such as independence.
4.       If joining would get us a state secretary in the fed. Govt, what would that in essence mean, except a position for some-one? What is the added value of Roland?
5.       This thing about the motion of non-confidence is b.s. Then why did they call for her resignation? Obviously, they did that not knowing better, but it is there. But I remain convinced that notwithstanding, they would not hesitate to bring her in. Why share power equally, when you can get total control by throwing MBM a commissioner post?
6.       We should be concentrating on renewing strategies for the DP. A fourth term in these times is unprecedented. Look at recent elections in the region. Performing governments have been unseated.  Look at the polls in St.Kitts for a man like Douglas, who has done everything right. Yet, from polls he will get a run for his money.
7.       “lest we end  up like Moses and the promised land”.
You don’t have to ask what I spend my week-end doing, chilling out at  Mullet Bay Beach with the family and grands. I don’t think I have been there since the hurricanes. How is Eldridge doing? Let him know I inquired about him.
Enjoy your days abroad. And remember “stay out of trouble”, at least until you’re back.
 
SWW
 
 
HI COMISH, ITS BEEN A WHILE: A FEW THINGS. COMMISH, FROM ALL INDICATIONS THIS COALITION “THING” IS TICKLISH. INITIALY I THOUGHT OK. BUT NOW PERSONALY “NO”, UNLESS BETTER CANT BE DONE. I THINK WE HAVE
To comed@sintmaarten.net Subject: next move…
 
From: julianrollocks@hotmail.com
Sent: Sun 7/20/08 4:38 PM
To: comed@sintmaarten.net Subject: next move…
 
 
 
 
HI COMISH,
 

ITS BEEN A WHILE:

A FEW THINGS.

 

COMMISH,

FROM ALL INDICATIONS THIS COALITION “THING” IS TICKLISH.

INITIALY I THOUGHT OK. BUT NOW PERSONALY “NO”, UNLESS BETTER CANT BE DONE. I THINK WE HAVE ONE MORE OPTION.

AS LEADER OF DP AND OUR GOVERMENT YOU SHOULD CALL A MEETING BETWEEN YOURSELF AND COMM. BUNCAMPER.

YOU SHOULD DISCUSS WHAT HER NEEDS AND WANTS ARE. SHE MUST BE CONFRONTED WITH THE DAMAGE DONE, AND THE POSSIBILITIES OF THE FUTURE WITH OTHERS TRYING TO CAPITALISE ON THE DVIISION IN THE PARTY ON THIS ISSUE.

 

OPTION 1: RESIGN THE TELECOM PORTFOLIO WHICH WILL COOL OFF SOME OF THE CRIRICISM.

COMMISH FOR YOUR INFO, NA WONT MAKE THE FINAL STEP, AS THEY ARE PLANNING TO TELL THE PUBLIC WE HAVE FILED A MOTION NOT AGAINST THE COMMISIONER OF TELECOM BUT AGAINST HOW SHE HANDLED THE PORTFOLIO.BUT OTHERWISE SHE IS VERY COMPETENT.

THIS SUPPOSE TO OPEN A DOOR FOR THEM TO WORK WITH M.B.

SO THEY ARE LEAVING 2 DOORS OPEN.THE DP DOOR AND THE M.B DOOR.

 

OPTION 2: SIT WITH M.B. COME TO AN UNDERSTANDING. CALL A JOINT PRESS CONFERENCE AND CLEAR UP THE SITUATION TO THE PUBLIC OF SXM.

 

OPTION 3: SIT WITH “GOLDEN” BOY AND EXPLAINE HIM WHY ITS BETTER WE MAINTAIN GOVT AS IS.HE IS FOR THE “BROADBASE”.

 

IN CLOSING,

COMMISH I AM GOING CURACAO TO PICK UP THE FAMILY TO GO TO MIAMI FOR A 10 DAY VACATION.

 

LETS STAY IN TOUCH, AND PLEASE STAY OUT OF TROUBLE TILL I SEE YOU. I WILL DO THE SAME.

 

 

GROETJES,

JR

 

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s